HomeArmenian Diaspora(s) in Motion: Places, Stakeholders and Practices in the 21st Century

Armenian Diaspora(s) in Motion: Places, Stakeholders and Practices in the 21st Century

Diaspora(s) arménienne(s) en mouvement : espaces, acteurs et pratiques au XXIe siècle

*  *  *

Published on Tuesday, May 23, 2023

Abstract

Since diaspora studies emerged in the 1980s, the Armenian dispersion has played a prominent role in the scholarly literature seeking to understand and classify the nature, forms, and effects of diasporas as social formations. However, 40 years after the rise of diaspora studies, one has to admit that far from offering a stable paradigm, the Armenian diaspora (an expression that should be used in the plural) has undergone numerous transformations. The objective of this 2-day conference will be to reflect on these contemporary reshapings of the Armenian diaspora(s), revealing their diversity and the new dynamics at work.

Announcement

Argument

Since diaspora studies emerged in the 1980s, the Armenian dispersion has played a prominent role in the scholarly literature seeking to understand and classify the nature, forms, and effects of diasporas as social formations.

Although the notion of diaspora is multifaceted – changing based on the cases observed, criteria retained, disciplinary fields, and its dissemination and use by various actors (Hovanessian, 1998; Brubaker, 2005; Dufoix, 2011) – the Armenian experience, along with the Greek and Jewish cases, is widely discussed in works attempting to establish typologies of uprooted communities (Cohen, 1997; Bruneau, 1995, 2022; Sheffer, 2003; Tölölyan, 1996) as well as in the efforts to compare the diasporas considered paradigmatic (Bruneau et al., 2007; Hovannisian and Myers, 1999).

Among the criteria associated with the Armenian case, the longevity of the dispersion (Bruneau, 2007; Tölölyan, 2005; Panossian, 2006), a shared collective memory (Safran, 1991), and the vitality of an active minority that relies on old and conservative institutions (Ter Minassian, 1997; Tölölyan, 2000) are often cited. They help maintain transnational networks and nurture an “imagined community”, as well as a wished-for cohesion, especially in moments of converging mobilizations (Tölölyan, 1996).

However, 40 years after the rise of diaspora studies, one has to admit that far from offering a stable paradigm, the Armenian diaspora (an expression that should be used in the plural) has undergone numerous transformations. This is partly due to the ebb and flow of geopolitics, new technological developments, and socio-economic changes in the historical centers of the Armenian presence.

With the end of the Soviet Union, new types of migration surfaced. Emigration from the Republic of Armenia – often perceived, justly or unjustly, as a “bleeding wound” – has profoundly changed the face of the diaspora. What is more, the last three decades have seen intensified processes of permanent or temporary “return” migration, reshaping the diaspora, Armenia, the ties between them, and leading to new modes of life in-between. By the same token, new communities have sprung up in places that were not traditional Armenian settlements. Conversely, regions that had been home to genocide refugees and their descendants, and that had grown into full-blown epicenters of the “Armenian transnation”, have gradually or abruptly been emptied of their Armenian population in the wake of political crises, wars and economic instability (Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Syria). Such recent developments call for a reassessment of the notions of homeland(s), home(s) and belonging(s) (Kasbarian, 2015 and 2020; Darieva, 2011; Panossian, 2014).

Similarly, territories with a long-standing Armenian presence, dating back to the 1920s (France, Belgium) or even the end of the 19th century (United States), have witnessed the arrival of new cohorts of Armenian immigrants hailing from new regions (Armenia, the Caucasus, and Russia after the end of the USSR, Syria after 2011), with heterogeneous socio-economic profiles. The settlement of these newly-arrived co-ethnics has paved the way for an ethno-cultural “replenishment” (Jimenez, 2010), revitalizing traditional community structures (schools, media, religious and political organizations, etc.). However, it has also given rise to new problems and questions at the individual and institutional levels, reshaping existing diasporic dynamics and leading to intra-group conflict, competition, mutual ignorance, or defiance, as noted by observers and stakeholders of the Armenian diaspora (Mekdjian, 2008; Cavoukian, 2021; Der Sarkissian, 2021).

While new diasporic communities are emerging, the historical loci of Armenian presence have lost their institutional resources and experienced new forms of member dispersal, fueling a declinist discourse centered on the haunting theme of “identity dilution” (Hovanessian, 2007). Simultaneously, voices that had previously been absent, ignored or imperceptible are gaining momentum, renewing the agenda of “ethno-political entrepreneurs” (Brubaker, 2004), and reinventing the repertoire of diasporic mobilization, which can take the form of aid and support for the disputed region of Karabagh, and can sometimes challenge or undermine traditional community structures, actors, and practices.

The objective of this 2-day conference will be to reflect on these contemporary reshapings of the Armenian diaspora(s), revealing their diversity and the new dynamics at work.

Proposals for papers may address the following issues, without necessarily being limited to them:

  • How have succeeding migration histories and the heterogeneity of cohorts transformed diasporic spaces and Armenian communities?
  • How have the various actors/stakeholders of the “old” diasporas responded to the demographic, political, and socio-cultural issues arising from the new context? What new actors have emerged?
  • What impact have different kinds of “return” migrations had, whether they involve settling in the (“step-”)homeland, making pilgrimages to historical Armenia, or volunteering for international or local NGOs, thereby combining tourism with assistance to the country and self-discovery? How can the notion of homeland be reframed by the co-presence of a real homeland, and an imaginary or surrogate homeland?
  • What new diasporic loci have emerged in the Armenian world? What roles do they play in this new set of dynamics?
  • How does language reflect the ongoing changes occurring within Armenian diasporas?
  • What roles do the media and social networks play on these transformations?
  • How can we map out the contemporary Armenian dispersion, as well as the spaces, dynamics, practices, actors, and discourses that compose it? Which fields should be further explored to refine our understanding of the vast diasporic web? Which actors are interested in unpacking it, why, and what tools and resources do they use?
  • What lessons can be drawn from other case studies? Beyond the classical comparisons between “textbook diasporas”, what other examples can be explored to better grasp and gauge what is currently at stake?

Participation guidelines

  • Dates : March 14 and 15, 2024
  • Submission guidelines: papers may be presented either in English or French. Abstracts (500 words) along with a short biographical notice must be sent

to diasporas.in.motion@gmail.com

by June 30, 2023.

  • Notification of selection from the scientific committee: July 2023
  • Travel expenses : participants’ travel and hotel expenses can be covered by the conference organizers.
  • Publication: the conference will be followed by a peer-reviewed publication in Études arméniennes contemporaines. The selected participants are expected to turn in a first draft of their article by March 1st, 2024. 

Organizing committee

  • Boris Adjemian (AGBU Nubar library, CRH-EHESS, Institut Convergences Migrations)
  • Anouche Der Sarkissian (Sorbonne Nouvelle, CREW, Institut Convergences Migrations)
  • Alain Navarra de Borgia - Navassartian (University of Bologna)
  • Yann Scioldo-Zürcher (CNRS, CRH-EHESS, Institut Convergences Migrations)

Scientific committee

  • Boris Adjemian (AGBU Nubar library, CRH-EHESS, Institut Convergences Migrations)
  • Michel Bruneau (CNRS)
  • James Cohen (Sorbonne Nouvelle, CREW)
  • Anouche Der Sarkissian (Sorbonne Nouvelle, CREW, Institut Convergences Migrations)
  • Stéphane De Tapia (Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, UMR 7043)                                     
  • Stéphane Dufoix (Paris Nanterre, Sophiapol)
  • Shushan Karapetian (USC Institute of Armenian Studies)
  • Sossie Kasparian (University of Stirling)
  • Alain Navarra de Borgia - Navassartian (University of Bologna)
  • Yann Scioldo-Zürcher (CNRS, CRH-EHESS, Institut Convergences Migrations)
  • Gayane Shagoyan (Institute of Archeology and Ethnography in Yerevan)
  • Taline Ter Minassian (Institut national des langues orientales, CREE)
  • Khachig Tölölyan (Wesleyan University)

References

  • Brubaker Rogers, “Ethnicity Without Groups”, European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie / Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie, 43 (2), 2002, pp. 163-189.
  • Brubaker Rogers, “The ‘diaspora’ diaspora”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28 (1), 2005, pp. 1-19.
  • Bruneau Michel, Ioannis Hassiotis, Martine Hovanessian et Claire Mouradian (eds.), Arméniens et Grecs en diaspora : approches comparatives, Athènes, École française d'Athènes, 2007.
  • Cavoukian Kristin, “Democratization and diaspora. The Velvet Revolution and the Armenian nation abroad”, in Laurence Broers and Anna Ohanyan (eds.), Armenia’s Velvet Revolution. Authoritarian Decline and Civil resistance in a Multipolar World, London and New York, I.B. Tauris, 2021, pp. 201-230.
  • Cohen Robin, Global Diasporas : An Introduction, London, University College London Press, 1997.
  • Darieva Tsypylma, “Rethinking homecoming: diasporic cosmopolitanism in post-Soviet Armenia”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2011, pp. 490-508.
  • Der Sarkissian Anouche, “Le Portrait fragmenté des familles immigrées aux États-Unis. L’exemple des Arméniens-Américains de Californie”, in Sophie Chapuis et Marie Moreau (eds.), Representing the Contemporary North American Family: Family Portraits, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2021, pp. 22-50.
  • Dufoix Stéphane, La dispersion : une histoire des usages du mot diaspora, Paris, Éditions Amsterdam, 2011.
  • Hovanessian Martine, “Diasporas et identités collectives”, Hommes et migrations, no. 1265, 2007, pp. 8-21.
  • Hovanessian Martine, “La notion de diaspora : usages et champ sémantique”, Journal des anthropologues, 72-73, 1998, pp. 11-30.
  • Jiménez Tomàs, Replenished ethnicity: Mexican Americans, Immigration, and Identity, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 2010.
  • Kasbarian Sossie, “The myth and reality of ‘return’ – diaspora in the ‘homeland’”, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 18 (3), 2015, pp. 358-381.
  • Kasbarian Sossie, “Refuge in the 'homeland': The Syrians in Armenia”, in J. Laycock & F. Piana (eds.), Aid to Armenia: Humanitarianism and intervention from the 1890s to the present. Humanitarianism: Key Debates and New Approaches, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2020, pp. 164-180.
  • Mekdjian Sarah, “Tension entre centralité et fragmentation : les quartiers arméniens à Los Angeles”, Diversité urbaine, 8 (1), 2008, pp. 45-61.
  • Panossian Razmik, “The ‘Drunkenness’ of Statehood”, Études arméniennes contemporaines, 3, 2014, pp. 119-126.
  • Panossian Razmik, The Armenians: from Kings and Priests to Merchants and Commissars, New York,  Columbia University Press, 2006.
  • Safran William, “Diasporas in Modern Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return”, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 1 (1), 1991, pp. 83-99.
  • Sheffer Gabriel, Diaspora Politics: At Home Abroad, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • Ter Minassian Anahide, Histoires croisées : Diaspora, Arménie, Transcaucasie 1890-1990, Marseille, Parenthèses, 1997.
  • Tölölyan Khachig, “Armenian diaspora”, in M. Ember, C.R. Ember & I. Skoggard (eds.), Encyclopedia of diasporas : immigrants and refugee cultures around the world, vol. 1, Overviews and topics, New York, Kluwer Academic, Plenum Publishers, 2005, pp. 35-64.
  • Tölölyan Khachig, “Elites and Institutions in the Armenian Transnation”, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 9 (1), 2000, pp. 107-136.
  • Tölölyan Khachig, “Rethinking Diaspora(s): Stateless Power in the Transnational Moment”, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 5 (1), 1996, pp. 3-36.

Places

  • Centre des Colloques - Campus Condorcet
    Aubervilliers, France (93)

Event attendance modalities

Full on-site event


Date(s)

  • Friday, June 30, 2023

Keywords

  • Armenia, diaspora(s), transnation, migration

Contact(s)

  • Boris Adjemian
    courriel : diasporas [dot] in [dot] motion [at] gmail [dot] com
  • Anouche Der Sarkissian
    courriel : diasporas [dot] in [dot] motion [at] gmail [dot] com
  • Alain Navarra
    courriel : diasporas [dot] in [dot] motion [at] gmail [dot] com
  • Yann Scioldo-Zürcher
    courriel : diasporas [dot] in [dot] motion [at] gmail [dot] com

Information source

  • Anouche Der Sarkissian
    courriel : diasporas [dot] in [dot] motion [at] gmail [dot] com

License

CC0-1.0 This announcement is licensed under the terms of Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal.

To cite this announcement

« Armenian Diaspora(s) in Motion: Places, Stakeholders and Practices in the 21st Century », Call for papers, Calenda, Published on Tuesday, May 23, 2023, https://doi.org/10.58079/1b7z

Archive this announcement

  • Google Agenda
  • iCal
Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search