Materiality and Confinements in the Medieval and Early Modern Eras: Objects, Actors and Experiences
Matérialité et enfermements au Moyen Âge et à l’époque moderne : objets, acteurs et expériences
Abstract
The international conference “Materiality and Confinements in the Medieval and Early Modern Eras: Objects, Actors, Experiences” examines confinements through the lens of their materiality. Drawing on a recent historiographical broadening of the field, the conference aims to address various forms of medieval and early modern confinement, both judicial and non-judicial: prisons, galleys, hospitals, workhouses, cloisters, monasteries, and the like. Contributions are encouraged that reflect on how material history and its sources could contribute to a better understanding of different institutions of confinement and their actors (confined individuals, monks, jailers, doctors, suppliers…), practices, and infrastructures.
Announcement
International conference, University of Lausanne (Switzerland), 22–24 April 2026
Argument
Since the theoretical debates that first emerged in the 1960s and subsequent foundational studies (Goffman 1961, Foucault 1975, Perrot 1980, Ignatieff 1980) which launched lasting interest in the topic of prisons, various perspectives have expanded our understanding of carceral institutions and confinement practices. The influence of social history and microhistory, as well as the spatial and archival turns, has allowed historians to open new fields of research into the topic and to explore new sources. In particular, the significant shift from a broader analysis of punishment institutions to a focus on “prison experiences” (Spierenburg 1991) has shown the potential of carceral and penal institution archives to reveal aspects of everyday prison life (e.g., Geltner 2008, Gibson 2019, Muchnik 2019, Abdela 2019). Recent studies have advocated focusing on prisoners’ experiences and trajectories (Abdela 2023, 2024), using archival sources to uncover ordinary, daily events such as diet, the spread of disease, interpersonal relationships, riots, and escapes. And yet, even though objects and things are central to confinement experiences, the materiality of confinement remains largely understudied (Abdela 2024), except in a few studies (e.g., Carr 2025, Cassidy-Welch 2001, 2011). Confinement is defined by walls that separate individuals from society; these walls act as a spatial and administrative infrastructure which limits inmates’ physical or mental contact, both with the outside world and within the space of the institution itself. Beyond the mere walls, daily interactions between confined individuals, institutional authorities, and staff are largely paved and defined by a variety of things: food, water, books, graffiti, clothes, money, letters, official registers, medicine, punishment objects, etc. In this regard, and drawing on the material turn in history since the early 2000s, things – whether “tangible” things physically available to historians or “textual” things described in written sources (Lester 2024, 191) – might offer an additional perspective on the history of confinements more broadly, especially when addressing forms of “prison before the prison” (Peters 1995).
The international conference “Materiality and Confinements in the Medieval and Early Modern Eras: Objects, Actors, Experiences” examines confinements through the lens of their materiality. Drawing on a recent historiographical broadening of the field (Claustre, Heullant-Donat, Lusset and Bretschneider 2011, 2015, 2017), the conference aims to address various forms of medieval and early modern confinement, both judicial and non-judicial: prisons, galleys, hospitals, workhouses, cloisters, monasteries, and the like. At the same time, it seeks to reflect on methodological questions pertaining to material history as an approach and to the sources that underpin it. “Material culture”, as Anne Gerritsen and Giorgio Riello summarised, “encompasses more than simply material objects. Objects have meanings for the people who produce and own, purchase and gift, use and consume them. Material culture therefore consists not merely of ‘things’, but also of the meanings they hold for people” (Gerritsen & Riello 2021, 3). At the same time, one might add, they also carry a socio-economic dimension. Materiality might therefore open new ways of approaching and narrating the history of confinements, revealing “other registers and ways of knowing beyond the intellectual and cognitive” (Lester 2024, 203).
Contributions are encouraged that reflect on how material history and its sources could contribute to a better understanding of different institutions of confinement and their actors (confined individuals, monks, jailers, doctors, suppliers…), practices, and infrastructures. Indeed, as “the goal of the study of material culture is primarily to understand how people use the material world available to them” (Auslander 2012, 354), we seek to understand what was, in fact, available to confined individuals in carceral, cloistered, or hospital environments and how they acted with or towards a variety of objects, artifacts, and things across the different eras. Furthermore, in most cases, confined individuals have not left egodocuments behind and the archival sources thus do not provide personal written perspectives on their imprisonment, internment, or reclusion experiences. We thus aim to explore the extent to which focusing on materiality might offer divergent/additional information, whether described in written sources or available in other kinds of material records. Is there a difference between “textual” and “tangible” things? Finally, we wish to explore whether there are any specificities to confinement things that set them apart from similar “things” in other settings. We seek to bring together contributions that address different phases of the history of confinements: for instance, the ecclesiastical practices of detrusio in monasterium and immuratio (from late antiquity to the 13th century in particular), the major shift in civil law in the 16th century which marked the crystallization of centuries of canonical penal praxis influence, or the introduction of a correlation between the seriousness of the offence and the length of the prison sentence that came to characterize early modern prisons. The conference will therefore provide an opportunity to discuss the evolution of confinement across the medieval and early modern periods, to identify possible changes, turning points and continuities across these eras, and to draw comparisons.
We welcome proposals related (but not limited) to one or more of the following research areas:
1. Everyday life and sociability
Whether in prisons, hospitals, or convents, objects are used, exchanged, made, repurposed, allowed, forbidden: from books to food, work tools, letters, money, or beds, objects inform and impact everyday experiences. Recent studies have suggested that things “have the capacity… to shift social relations” (Lester 2024, 197). We welcome contributions on the materiality of everyday life and sociability. To what extent do things represent or affect confined individuals’ social lives (or lack thereof)? How do they impact their day-to-day agency? This research area might include various aspects of everyday life, from labour to spiritual exchanges, including the question of time in confinement. Contributions might also question the role that materiality played in sociability between inmates as well as with the various actors of confinement, both within and outside the walls – including visitors and confined individuals’ networks of solidarity.
2. Confinement spaces
While the question of the spaces of confinement has attracted some recent attention from historians in the wake of the spatial turn (e.g. Charageat, Lusset, and Vivas 2021), it nevertheless remains widely understudied in history (Abdela 2024, Bretschneider 2017) when compared to the more abundant research in the fields of sociology or geography (e.g. Milhaud 2017). We welcome contributions focusing on the materiality and material culture of confinement spaces. This includes both the spaces within the walls – including the impact of architecture on confined experiences and the role that things play in the spatial separation (or lack thereof) of various confined populations – and around the infrastructure. This research area might question the architectural specificities of the medieval and early modern eras; for example, the adaptation of cloisters and the like to incarceration/penal purposes or the spread of specialised prison spaces for different social groups, crimes, genders, or ages. As both medieval and early modern confinement spaces were characterised by their porosity, contributions might also question connections between the inside and the outside (e.g., through the mobility of objects, such as letters) and activities that take place outside the walls, such as (forced) labour, economic transactions, family or church visits, or recovery leaves.
3. Administration and the transmission of knowledge and skills
Medieval and early modern confinement institutions were closely connected to the outside world on various levels, first and foremost administratively and financially (Bretschneider 2008). From the keeping of prison registers to the bringing of food and the provision of beds, things were at the heart of keeping confinement institutions operational. How might materiality inform us about the way that these institutions were economically, socially, or politically embedded in the societies to which they belonged (Abdela 2024)? Contributions might reflect on the concrete, day-to-day material running of the institutions and their actors (including merchants, entrepreneurs, or craftsmen) or on the administrative knowledge necessary to run them. The materiality of institutional archives and their preservation is also an important consideration. Furthermore, prisons, convents, hospitals, and other institutions of confinement were filled not only with knowledge and skills carried by various actors (doctors, priests, jailors), but also with things pertaining to that knowledge and skills: “an object’s materiality conveys myriad intersecting forms of knowledge” (Lester 2024, 187). What do things reveal in terms of knowledge and skills transmission within the walls and beyond? To what extent did confined individuals themselves produce knowledge? Contributions might focus on various types of knowledge and skills, including prison writings, medical skills, religious knowledge, work-related knowledge, and the like, whether carried into confinement or acquired there.
4. Power relations and violence
The vast majority of sources for the history of confinement were produced by institutional authorities. This conference aims to reflect on the potential of materiality to provide a perspective from below on individual experiences. Contributions might focus on confrontations with authority (for example, in terms of prison escapes, punishment, various cases of violence, etc.) and how objects framed power relations in confinement. As recent studies suggest, things likewise might construct and deconstruct social statuses (Cerutti, Glesener, Grangaud 2024). When it came to prison escapes, uprisings, or punishments, what role did the things available to inmates play in granting individuals their freedom? Contributions might also focus on the extent to which things defined the way in which authorities regulated confinement institutions (through violence and punishment, for instance).
We welcome proposals based on various types of tangible and textual sources (material, written, iconographic, archaeological) that focus on various confinement institutions and populations from across the medieval and early modern world (up to but not including the revolutionary era). Proposals focusing on gender, religious, and social differences, as well as underexplored regions of the world, are especially welcome.
Keynote speaker
Sophie Abdela, Professor at the History Department of the University of Sherbrooke, Canada
Practical information
The working languages of the conference will be English and French.
The conference will be held in person at the University of Lausanne. We will submit a funding application to the Swiss National Science Foundation to cover participants’ travel and accommodation costs.
We aim to publish selected papers in a thematic issue of a peer-reviewed international journal or in an edited volume with an international publisher.
Submission procedure and dates
22 September 2025 : Please send your proposal to nathalie.dahn-singh@unil.ch.
Proposals (max. 350 words) should include a title, a clear research question, and a short bibliography. Please provide a short bio-bibliographical text as well (max. 150 words).
Early November 2025 : Notification of proposal acceptance
Scientific committee
(in alphabetical order)
Frances Andrews (University of St Andrews), Pascal Bastien (Université du Québec à Montréal), Falk Bretschneider (EHESS, Institut franco-allemand de sciences historiques et sociales de Francfort), Christian G. De Vito (University of Vienna), Joachim Eibach (University of Bern), Laurence Fontaine (EHESS), Anne Gerritsen (University of Warwick), Guy Geltner (Monash University), Johan Heinsen (Aalborg University), Marie Houllemare (Université de Genève), Élisabeth Lusset (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), Mary Laven (University of Cambridge), Ludovic Maugué (Équipe Damoclès, Université de Genève), Vincent Milliot (Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis), Renaud Morieux (University of Cambridge), Natalia Muchnik (EHESS), Xavier Rousseaux (Université catholique de Louvain), Riccarda Suitner (Ludwig Maximilians University Munich), Mathieu Vivas (Université de Lille).
Organisers
Dr. Nathalie Dahn-Singh, University of Lausanne: nathalie.dahn-singh@unil.ch
Dr. Anna Clara Basilicò, FBK – Istituto Storico Italo Germanico: abasilico@fbk.eu
Please do not hesitate to contact us for any questions pertaining to this Call for Papers
Selected references
Abdela Sophie and Pascal Bastien, eds. Actes du colloque: Enfermements: Pratiques, expériences et parcours de détention (XVIe–XIXe siècles). Criminocorpus 23 (2023). https://journals.openedition.org/criminocorpus/13135.
Abdela, Sophie. “Prisons on the Edge: Perspectives on the Late Medieval and Early Modern History of Confinement in the Francosphere.” The English Historical Review 139, no. 598–99 (2024): 868–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ceae116.
Abdela, Sophie. La prison parisienne au XVIIIe siècle: Formes et réformes. Ceyzérieu: Champ Vallon, 2019.
Ahnert, Ruth. The Rise of Prison Literature in the Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Antonielli, Livio, ed. Carceri, carcerieri e carcerati: Dall’antico regime all’Ottocento. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 2006.
Appadurai, Arjun, ed. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Auslander, Leora. “Beyond Words.” The American Historical Review 110, no. 4 (2005): 1015–45. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.110.4.1015.
Auslander, Leora. “Material Culture and Materiality.” In Travelling Concepts for the Study of Culture, edited by Birgit Neumann and Ansgar Nünning, 353–70. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2012.
Bergel, Pierre and Milliot Vincent, eds. La ville en ébullition: Sociétés urbaines à l’épreuve. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2014. https://books.openedition.org/pur/50258.
Bretschneider, Falk. “Spatial turn et histoire de la justice pénale moderne.” Crime, Histoire & Sociétés / Crime, History & Societies 21, no. 2 (2017): 297–307. https://doi.org/10.4000/chs.1994.
Bretschneider, Falk. Gefangene Gesellschaft: Eine Geschichte der Einsperrung in Sachsen im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert. Constance: UVK, 2008.
Carr, Gilly, A Materiality of Internment. London; New York, Routledge, 2025.
Carré, Jacques. La prison des pauvres: L’expérience des workhouses en Angleterre. Paris: Éditions Vendémiaire, 2016.
Cassidy-Welch, Megan. Monastic Spaces and their Meanings: Thirteenth-century English Cistercian Monasteries. Turnhout: Brepols, 2001.
Cassidy-Welch, Megan. Imprisonment in the Medieval Religious Imagination, c. 1150-1400. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011.
Castillo Gómez, Antonio and Martínez Miguel. “Writing, Memory and Subalternity in the Early Modern World.” Journal of Early Modern Studies 13 (2024): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.36253/jems-2279-7149-15269.
Cerutti, Simona, Thomas Glesener, and Isabelle Grangaud, eds. La Cité des choses: Une nouvelle histoire de la citoyenneté. Toulouse: Anacharsis, 2024.
Charageat, Martine, Élisabeth Lusset, and Mathieu Vivas, eds. Les espaces carcéraux au Moyen Âge. Pessac: Ausonius éditions, 2021. https://una-editions.fr/les-espaces-carceraux-au-moyen-age/.
Claustre, Julie, Isabelle Heullant-Donat, and Élisabeth Lusset, eds. Enfermements. Volume I: Le cloître et la prison (VIe-XVIIIe siècle). Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne, 2011. DOI: 10.4000/books.psorbonne.72874.
De Certeau, Michel. L’invention du quotidien: I. Arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard, 1990.
De Munck, Bert. “Artisans, Products and Gifts: Rethinking the History of Material Culture in Early Modern Europe.” Past & Present 224 (2014): 39–74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24545174.
Findlen, Paula (dir.). Early Modern Things: Objects and their Histories, 1500-1800. 2nd edition. London; New York: Routledge, 2021 (2013).
Foucault, Michel. Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard, 1975.
Geltner, Guy. The Medieval Prison: A Social History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
Gerritsen, Anna and Giorgio Riello, eds. Writing Material Culture History. 2nd edition. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021 (2015).
Gibson, Mary. Italian Prisons in the Age of Positivism 1861–1914. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.
Gibson, Mary. “The Everyday Life of Inmates: Alternative Sources for Italian Prison History.” Meridiana 101 (2021): 23–40.
Heinsen, Johan. “Historicizing Extramural Convict Labour: Trajectories and Transitions in Early Modern Europe.” International Review of Social History 66, no. 1 (2021): 111–33. DOI: 10.1017/S0020859020000498.
Heullant-Donat, Isabelle, Julie Claustre, Élisabeth Lusset, and Falk Bretschneider, eds. Enfermements. Volume II: Règles et dérèglements en milieu clos (IVe–XIXe siècle). Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne, 2015. DOI: 10.4000/books.psorbonne.56453.
Heullant-Donat, Isabelle, Julie Claustre, Falk Bretschneider, and Élisabeth Lusset, eds. Enfermements. Volume III: Le genre enfermé: Hommes et femmes en milieux clos (XIIIe–XXe siècle). Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne, 2017. DOI : 10.4000/books.psorbonne.71847.
Houllemare, Marie. Justices d’empire: La répression dans les colonies françaises au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2024.
Ignatieff, Michael. A Just Measure of Pain: The Penitentiary in the Industrial Revolution 1750–185. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.
Laven, Mary. “Cast Out and Shut in: The Experience of Nuns in Counter-Reformation Venice.” In At the Margins: Minority Groups in Premodern Italy, edited by Stephen J. Milner, 93–110. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.
Lester, Anne E. “Introduction: Materiality and Methodology: Ways of Knowing and Narrating.” The Medieval History Journal 26, no. 2 (2024): 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/09719458231220417.
Maugué, Ludovic. “‘Vouer le crime à l’industrie’: La manufacture carcérale d’Embrun: première maison centrale française et prison du Département du Léman (1798–1813).” PhD. diss. Université de Genève, 2016. DOI: 10.13097/archive-ouverte/unige:86258.
Mc Mahon, Richard, Joachim Eibach, and Randolph Roth. “Making Sense of Violence? Reflections on the History of Interpersonal Violence in Europe.” Crime, Histoire & Sociétés / Crime, History & Societies 17, no. 2 (2013): 5–26. https://doi.org/10.4000/chs.1423.
Melossi, Dario and Massimo Pavarini. The Prison and the Factory: Origins of the Penitentiary System. London: Macmillan, 1981.
Milhaud, Olivier. Séparer et punir: Une géographie des prisons françaises. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2017.
Morieux, Renaud. The Society of Prisoners: Anglo-French Wars and Incarceration in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Muchnik, Natalia. Les prisons de la foi: L’enfermement des minorités (XVIe-XVIIIe siècle). Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2019.
Neppi Modona, Guido. “Gli archivi carcerari: storia dell’istituzione penitenziaria o storia del detenuti?” In La follia, la norma, l’archivio: Prospettive storiografiche e orientamenti archivistici, edited by Mario Galzigna, 229–34. Venice: Marsilio, 1984.
Perrot, Michelle, ed. L’impossible prison: recherches sur le système pénitentiaire au XIXe siècle. Paris: Seuil, 1980.
Perrot, Michelle. Les ombres de l’histoire: Crime et châtiment au XIXe siècle. Paris: Flammarion, 2001.
Peters, Edward M. “Prison before the Prison: The Ancient and Medieval Worlds.” In The Oxford History of the Prison: The Practice of Punishment in Western Society, edited by Norval Morris and David J. Rothman, 3–43. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195118148.003.0001.
Petit, Jacques-Guy. Ces peines obscures: La prison pénale en France 1780-1875. Paris: Fayard, 1990.
Porret Michel, Vincent Fontana, and Ludovic Maugué, eds. Bois, fers, papiers de justice: Histoire matérielle du droit de punir. Geneva: Georg, 2012.
Richardson, Catherine, Tara Hamling, and David Gaimster, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Material Culture in Early Modern Europe. London: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613161.
Riello, Giorgio. “The ‘Material Turn’ in World and Global History.” Journal of World History 33, no. 2 (2022): 193–232. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2022.0019.
Roche, Daniel. Histoire des choses banales. Naissance de la consommation dans les sociétés traditionnelles (XVIIe-XIXe siècle). Paris: Fayard, 1997.
Rothman, David J. The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1971.
Rousseaux, Xavier. “Crime et justice au prisme de l’histoire visuelle et matérielle.” Crime, Histoire et Sociétés / Crime, History and Societies 21, no. 2 (2017): 321–34. https://doi.org/10.4000/chs.2010.
Spierenburg, Pieter. The Prison Experience: Disciplinary Institutions and their Inmates in Early Modern Europe. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2007. Originally published New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1991.
Suitner, Riccarda. Venice and the Radical Reformation: Italian Anabaptism and Antitrinitarianism in European Context. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2024.
Thatcher Ulrich, Laurel, Ivan Gaskell, Sara Schechner, and Sarah Anne Carter. Tangible Things: Making History through Objects. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Trentmann, Frank. “Materiality in the Future of History: Things, Practices, and Politics.” Journal of British Studies 48 (2009): 283–307.
Vito, Christian G. de. Camosci e Girachiavi : Storia del Carcere in Italia. Bari: Laterza, 2009.
Vito, Christian G. de and Alex Lichtenstein. “Writing a Global History of Convict Labour.” International Review of Social History 58, no. 2 (2013): 285–325.
Places
- Université de Lausanne
Lausanne, Switzerland (1015)
Event attendance modalities
Full on-site event
Attached files
Keywords
- enfermements, matérialité, histoire matérielle, Moyen Âge, époque moderne, pratiques, acteurs, expériences, prison, hôpitaux, monastères, confinement, materiality, material history, Middle Ages, early modern era, actors, experiences, hospitals, mo
Contact(s)
- Nathalie Dahn-Singh
courriel : nathalie [dot] dahn-singh [at] unil [dot] ch - Anna Clara Basilicò
courriel : abasilico [at] fbk [dot] eu
License
This announcement is licensed under the terms of Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal.
To cite this announcement
« Materiality and Confinements in the Medieval and Early Modern Eras: Objects, Actors and Experiences », Call for papers, Calenda, Published on Tuesday, July 08, 2025, https://doi.org/10.58079/14anj
Google Calendar
iCal