HomeImplementation of public policies on pesticides in the global South

HomeImplementation of public policies on pesticides in the global South

Implementation of public policies on pesticides in the global South

Mise en œuvre des politiques publiques sur les pesticides dans les Suds

*  *  *

Published on Friday, February 19, 2021


Public policies relating to pesticides have been developed and continue to be built, often accompanied by controversies revealing the complex interweaving of political, health, environmental and even economic issues. Existing public policies, supposed to guide and supervise professional practices, are very often implemented only very partially or not at all in African countries and other countries of the South. This Conference aims to analyze the implementation of public policies relating to pesticides in Southern countries, according to different approaches, mainly but not exclusively based on the social sciences.



This Conference at the University Alassane Ouattara (Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire) is organized as part of the PoPPesCI project (Public Policies and Pesticides in urban Agriculture), a transdisciplinary and multi-institutional research that mobilizes sociologists, anthropologists, jurists and political scientists, economists and geographers. These researchers are attached to the Center for Research and Development (CRD), the Legal, Administrative and Management Sciences Faculty (SJAG), the Faculty of Economics and Development (SED) of Alassane Ouattara University (UAO); the Department of Sociology and Anthropology of the University of Abomey Calavi (UAC, Benin, Southern partner); the Population Environment Development Laboratory (LPED) of the Institute of Research and Development (IRD) and the Center of Research and Studies on International Development (CERDI, CNRS-IRD) of the University of Clermont Auvergne (Northern partners, France).

The Conference follows on from the "Pesticides Politics in Africa" ​​Conference held in Arusha (Tanzania) from 28 to 31 May 2019. The work of this Conference, which brought together scientists, politicians and civil society actors, resulted in a call entitled "Arusha's call for action on pesticides" to decision-makers. The debates during this first Conference and the resulting action proposal have inspired this second conference. This second conference will be an occasion to make the assessment of the "Arusha's call for action on pesticides". . Fruit of the partnerships formed at the Arusha Conference, this Conference of Bouaké will be held in conjunction with the French Embassy in Tanzania (AFRICCAT project: Attractiveness of France, Research and Innovation - Climate Change and Agriculture in Tanzania) and the AVSF Association - Agronomists and Veterinarians Without Borders.


Public policies, from their production or conception to their implementation, are a research subject at the heart of scientific debates that bring connect different fields of research, including anthropology and sociology, which occupy more and more an important place.

Without rejecting the polysemy of the notion of public policy that one may find in Zittoun (2013) with the definitional approaches borrowed from authors such as Simon (1945), Dahl (1949), Lerner and Laswell (1951), Friedrich (1963), Easton (1965), Rose (1969), Jones (1970), Laswell (1971), etc., we adopt the idea of ​​regulation, control, governance of public action (Bayart and Warnier, 2004 ; Bayart, Mbembe and Toulabor, 2008; Hassenteufel, 2011; Zittoun, 2013; Lapeyre and Lemaître, 2014; Eboko, 2015; Paul, Milet and Crovella, 2016). Politically, "this is what governments decide to do or not to do" (Dye, 1972 cited by Zittoun, 2013). In other words, public policies are tools for regulating public action, seeking solutions adapted to the problems of society. Any good public policy, if we take into account its development, dissemination and transformation into a decision, requires specific work on politicization in which the capacity of spokespersons comes into play by making plausible not only its capacity to reduce disturbance in society but also the decision-making capacity of the leaders who put this policy in place (Zittoun, 2013). From this point of view, the transformation of a decision into public policy requires decision-makers’ willingness to ensure, and even to take on its legitimacy through the stabilization of their respective positions and the issues of power present.

Public policies in Africa represent a field lately investigated by social science research. When public policies are addressed by social sciences in Africa they are often confined to areas of public action such as health (Dozon, 2001; Vidal, 1996, 1999; Eboko, 2005; Ridde and Olivier de Sardan, 2012) or “development” (Olivier de Sardan, 1995; Berthelemy, 2016). The analysis of public policies applied to these objects would document the process of struggle, identify dysfunctions, reveal the disparity between texts and their implementation, and rethink public action around these major issues. But, what about the analysis of the implementation of public policies related to pesticides?

The use of pesticide on the continent significantly increased over the past two decades due to their ability to secure yields and reduce the workload of farmers, but also through the effect of representations of their efficiency and possibility of having “beautiful vegetables” (Yao, 2017; Adou, 2017; Daleb et al., 2018). However, their multiple and serious toxic effects on health and the environment are well documented today (Adigoun, 2002; Soclo et al., 2004; Traore et al, 2006; Ahouangninou et al., 2011; Akogbeto, 2011; Agbohessi et al., 2012; Bonnefoy, 2012; Inserm, 2013; Anses, 2014). These fuel concerns and stir up debates. Pesticides being substances intended to “destroy or fight pests, including vehicles of human or animal diseases, pests, and undesirable species of plants or animals causing damage…” (FAO, 2013) are toxic by definition. The risks associated with their use in agriculture are well established. They are a source of public health problems everywhere, including in Africa (Thiam and Sagna, 2009). They threaten the health of users, but also their families, consumers of products sprayed with these substances, and the population in general (WHO, 1991; Assogba-Komlan et al, 2007). Indirectly, agricultural pesticides contribute to the persistence of vector-borne diseases by generating resistance among some pathology vectors (FAO, 2013; CNEV, 2014; Corbel et al, 2007). In addition, these products not only threaten health, but are also a danger for the environment (pollution of the soil, subsoil, water, air, etc., Cisse et al, 2003; Calvet et al. al, 2005; Traore et al, 2006). They are even a risk factor for suicide (Center for pesticide suicide prevention- https://centerpsp.org/the-problem/; WHO, 1991; Passos, 2006). While the link between the use of pesticides in agriculture, health and the environment has been widely studied, the role of health and environmental considerations in the development and implementation of public policies related to pesticides in Africa and in the South in general has not sufficiently drawn the attention of researchers. Yet, public policies are supposed to guide and regulate the use of pesticides to limit their harmful effects.

Public policies relating to pesticides have been developed and continue to be built, often accompanied by controversies revealing the complex interweaving of political, health, environmental and even economic issues. Existing public policies, supposed to guide and supervise professional practices, are very often implemented only very partially or not at all. With that in mind, research carried out in recent years, particularly in Africa (Alternet Program, Benin 2014; Lupaci Program, Côte d'Ivoire and Benin 2015-2017), and in other countries of the South (Nguyen et al. 2002; Jansen 2003, 2017) have clearly shown that the transposition of public policies into public action in the field is often very limited. The circulation and use of pesticides in agriculture often deviate significantly from recommendations and regulatory frameworks (Salles and Barrault, 2010; Adechian et al., 2015; Doudou and Simon, 2018; Ouattara and; Ouattara and Doudou, 2020). In addition, recent work of two teams of researchers clearly raises the issues related to the circulation of pesticides in Africa and the South in general, and point at the (in) effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (Equipements de Protection Individuels (EPI) in French). The first one (Ouattara and Doudou, 2020) indicates that, in Europe, pesticides are subject to controversy, with regard to their effectiveness testified by farmers and their harmful effects on human health, in particular those based on glyphosate (Allemandou, 2019). In Côte d'Ivoire, glyphosate is the most common active ingredient in cotton cultivation. The other one (Garrigou et al., 2020) shows that particularly dangerous pesticides used in Africa are banned in Europe and that practices of wearing PPE / EPI are uncontrolled. The PPE / EPI does not always fulfill the protective function assigned to it in pesticide authorization procedures. Therefore, there is a gap between safety at work in theory and the real practical conditions. These studies reveal an inadequacy of the PPE / EPI for practical field conditions, which exposes users to health risks.

Opening up the debate on innovative perspectives, other researchers explore options for agriculture without synthetic pesticides, which would integrate alternative practices based on the use of natural agents, bio-pesticides, and new knowledge on the development of plants known as damaging (Hagstrum and Subramanyam, 2000; Hossain et al., 2017). Moreover, other research shows that the development of public policies on pesticides not only results from interaction between science and policy makers, but also is a product of civil society activism contributing the development of risks management (Barraza et al., 2013, Bohme, 2014; Arancibia and Motta, 2019; Nikol and Jansen 2020). All this leads to questioning the entire process of conceiving, developing, disseminating and adopting policies promoting various forms of agro-ecology that can significantly reduce the use of synthetic pesticides in the South.

As a follow-up to the Arusha Conference, held in 2019, this Conference aims to analyze the implementation of public policies relating to pesticides in Southern countries, according to different approaches, mainly but not exclusively based on the social sciences. The presentations will focus mainly on Africa. Analysis of public policies concerning other countries of the South will be welcomed to allow comparisons and future prospects. The Conference will be structured around four tracks. Presentations, whatever the chosen track, could pay particular attention to the logics of interacting social actors and to the enforcement of recommendations of Arusha's call in different countries.

Track 1: The social life of public policies from their conception to their implementation: history, methods of construction, and content

Historical, legal or political sciences and many other disciplines are invited to help understand the history, construction methods or the current content of public policies relating to pesticides and their uses in different countries.

Track 2: Transfers, transformations, political uses, and local variations of public policies related to pesticides

Attention will be paid to public policies at different levels: international, regional, national or local. Paper could address, for example, transfers of public policies (policy transfer), uses of public policies at national scales, or even local variations of international recommendations (glocalization).

Track 3: Contradictions and antagonisms at the crossroads of agricultural, health, economic, and environmental or ecological spaces

This track invites research focusing on contradictions, even antagonisms, in public policies developed in different political spaces (health, agricultural, economic or even environmental). Particular interest will be given to civil society activism opposing public policies on synthetic pesticides. It deals with the activities of actors promoting agro-ecology with a view to considerably reduce the use of synthetic pesticides. Research on agro-ecological alternatives and their inclusion in policies, negotiations for their adoption and implementation in the South will be welcomed. This could include research on farming communities, in particular young people, who support the reduction or removal of chemical pesticides as desired by advocates of agro-ecology.

Track 4: Marketing authorizations and safety at work

Here, the focus is on research on the circulation in the South of pesticides banned elsewhere, particularly in Europe. It may analyze links between marketing procedures and worker safety (pesticide sellers, farmers, etc.). Particular attention will be paid to the effectiveness of PPE / EPI and other technologies, guidelines or mechanisms developed for protecting workers in contact with synthetic pesticides. Presentations may examine marketing policies and relationship with use of protection equipment in field conditions.

Target audience

Researchers from various social sciences, human sciences, public health and public policy, specialists in environmental and health exposure, members of government agencies or NGOs involved in the regulation of pesticides, farmer organizations, agro-ecological associations, and industrial firms.

Application timeframe

  • Opening of the call for applications: January 15, 2021
  • Abstract submission: March 31, 2021

  • Evaluation of proposals: April 2021
  • Notification to authors of acceptance of papers: May 30, 2021
  • Preliminary program: July 31, 2021
  • The full papers for the Conference must be submitted electronically no later than September 15, 2021.

Abstract format

Title of the paper, Name, first name and email address

Function and institution, Address of the home institution

Size: 400 words

File format: Ms Word format

Languages: French and English

  • Questions and papers should be submitted to the following addresses:
  • Doudou Dimi Theodore : theodoredoudou@uao.edu.ci
  • Kouakou Konan Jérôme : jeromekouakou@uao.edu.ci
  • Djoman Judith Epse Meite : crd.dir@gmail.com

Scientific committee

  • Fall Abdou Salam (Pdt), Research Director, Sociology, Research Laboratory on Economic and Social Transformations (LARTES-IFAN), University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, Senegal.
  • Abe N’doumy Noël, Professor of Universities, Anthropology and Sociology, Alassane Ouattara University, Bouake, Côte d’Ivoire.
  • Audibert Martine, Emeritus Research Director and FERDI Senior Fellow, Economics, Economic Evaluation of Health Policies, CERDI, CNRS-IRD, Clermont-Ferrand, France. Bayili Bazoma, Research Engineer, Applied Biology, Environmental Toxicology, Insecticide Testing Laboratory, Health Sciences Research Institute, Western Regional Management (IRSS / DRO), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
  • Bekoin Tanoh, Associate Professor, History, Alassane Ouattara University, Department of History, Bouake, Côte d’Ivoire.
  • Bureau-Point Eve, Associate Researcher , Social and Cultural Anthropology, Norbert Elias Center, CNRS, Marseille, France.
  • Doudou Dimi Theodore, Senior Researcher, Sociology of Health, Laboratory of Health, Nutrition, Hygiene (L-SNH), Research Center for Development (CRD), Alassane Ouattara University (UAO) Bouake, Côte d’Ivoire.
  • Egrot Marc, Associate Researcher, Anthropology, Population Environment and Development Laboratory (LPED), Institute of Research and Development (IRD), Marseille, France.
  • Ferdinand Malcom, Associate Researcher, Political Science (political ecology), IRISSO / Paris Dauphine-PSL University, Paris, France.
  • Folley Ellen, University Professor, Anthropology, Klark University, United States of America.
  • Fournet Florence, Associate Researcher, Entomology, GIS, UMR 224 Mivegec, IRD, Montpelier, France.
  • Garrigou Alain, Professor of Universities, Ergonomics, EPICENE team (Epidemiology of cancers and environmental exposures), University of Bordeaux, Department of Hygiene, Safety & Environment, IUT & Bordeaux Population Health Center - Inserm U1219, Bordeaux, France.
  • Houngnihin Roch Apollinaire, Professor of Universities, Anthropology, Laboratory of Applied Anthropology (LAMA), University of Abomey Calavi, Cotonou, Benin.
  • Hunsmann Moritz, Researcher, Sociology, Institute for Interdisciplinary Research on Social Issues (IRIS), National Center for Scientific Research, Paris, France.
  • Jansen Kees, Associate Professor, Agrarian Sociology and Political Ecology, Rural Sociology Group - Wageningen University, Netherlands.
  • Kouassi N'goran François, Research Director, Anthropology and Socio-economics of Development, Laboratory of Agro-economics and Rural Development (LADR), CRD, Department of Anthropology and Sociology, Alassane Ouattara University, Bouake, Côte d'Ivoire.
  • Martin Thibaud, Associate Researcher, Entomology, Agro-ecology, Cirad, Deputy Director UR Hortsys, associate researcher at the Wascal UFHB Center of Excellence, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
  • Theoua Pelagie-N'dri, Associate Professor, Public Law, Center for Research and Study on Law and Public Finances (CREDFiP), Alassane Ouattara University, Bouake, Côte d’Ivoire.
  • Valentin Bauval, Agronomy and retired farmer, member of AVSF and of the editorial board of the journal Agriculture, Environment and Society of the AFA (French association of agronomy) - Former consultant of CIRAD and various NGOs and Professor of agro-ecology at the Higher School of Agriculture in Angers, France.

Organizers committee

Doudou Dimi Theodore (Pdt), Aba Atse Eric Noël, Adje Anoh Felix, Coulibaly Brahima, Dayoro Kevin, Diobo Kpaka Sabine Doudou, Djezou Baudelaire, Fondio Lassina, Gbahoui Nicaise, Mazou Gnazebo Hilaire, Akmel Meless Simeon, Ilboudo Sylvain, Jas Nathalie,  Kossonou Komoe, Kouadio Kouassi-Kan Adolphe, Kouadio M’bra K. Dieu-Donne, Konan Kouakou Blaise, Kouakou Konan Jerôme, Kouassi Edouard, Kra Gerard Landry Konan, Kra Walter, Mathieu Bertrand,Niamke Bobele Florence, Tuo Donoupkoro, Ouattara Zie Adama, Oura Kouadio Raphaël, Wognin Joël Anicet, Yao Esther Doris Kra; Adou Affoua Toutouwa Marie, Djoman Judith-Meite, Edehi Edess Jean, Gbegan Pascal, Kouablan Adjoua Jeanne d’Arc, Kouadio Adjoua Rachelle, Kouadio Aime Charles, Kouadio Laure, Kouadio Lorraine Nadia, Kipre Armand Maxim, Adou Bini Kouabenan Arnaud, Ouattara Kadidia Mah Soko,Yao Koffi Richmond.


Adechian, S.A., Baco, M.N., Akponikpe, I., Toko, I.I., Egah, J., Affoukou, K., 2015. Les pratiques paysannes de gestion des pesticides sur le maïs et le coton dans le bassin cotonnier du Bénin. VertigO. doi:10.4000/vertigo.16534

Adigoun, F.A., 2002. Impact des traitements phytosanitaires du niébé sur l’environnement et la santé des populations : cas de Klouékanmé et de la basse vallée de l’Ouémé (Bénin) (Mémoire de maîtrise professionnelle). Faculté des Lettres, Arts et Sciences Humaines (FLASH), Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.

Adou S.A, 2017. Ethnologie des acteurs, construction des représentations et des pratiques sociales liées à la circulation des pesticides à Bouaké.Mémoire de Master, Université Alassane Ouattara, Département d’Anthropologie et de sociologie.

Agbohessi, P.T., Toko, I.I., Yabi, J.A., Dassoundo-Assogba, J.F., Kestemont, P., 2012. Caractérisation des pesticides chimiques utilisés en production cotonnière et impact sur les indicateurs économiques dans la Commune de Banikoara au nord du Bénin. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 5, 1828–1841.

Agbohessi, T.P., Toko, I.I., Kestemont, P., 2012. État des lieux de la contamination des écosystèmes aquatiques par les pesticides organochlorés dans le Bassin cotonnier béninois. Cahiers Agricultures 21, 46–56. doi:10.1684/agr.2012.0535

Ahouangninou, C., Fayomi, B.E., Martin, T., 2011. Évaluation des risques sanitaires et environnementaux des pratiques phytosanitaires des producteurs maraîchers dans la commune rurale de Tori-Bossito (Sud-Bénin). Cahiers Agricultures 20, 216–222. doi:10.1684/agr.2011.0485

Akogbéto M., Djouaka R., Kindé-Gazard D., 2006. “Screening of pesticide residues in soil and water samples from agricultural settings”, Malaria Journal, n° 5, 22, 9 p. 

Akogbeto, M.C., Djouaka, R., Noukpo, H., 2005. Utilisation des insecticides agricoles au Bénin. Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique 98, 400–405.

Allemandou S. Dix choses à savoir sur le glyphosate. France 24, 2019. https://www.france24.com/fr/20190222-france-agriculture-10-choses-savoir-glyphosate

ANSES, 2014. Exposition des travailleurs agricoles aux pesticides. Revue systématique de la littérature scientifique disponible sur les expositions aux pesticides des travailleurs agricoles en France. Version janvier 2014. (Rapport), Autosaisine n°2011-SA-0192 « Travailleurs agricoles et pesticides ». ANSES. Comité d’experts spécialisé « Evaluation des risques liés aux milieux aériens ». Groupe de travail « Travailleurs agricoles et pesticides », Maisons-Alfort, France.

Arancibia, F. et Motta, R., 2019.Undone Science and Counter-Expertise: Fighting for Justice in an Argentine Community Contaminated by Pesticides. Science as Culture 28(3): 277-302.

Assogba-Komlan, F., Anihouvi, P., Achigan, E., Sikirou, R., Boko, A., Adje, C., Ahle, V., Vodouhe, R., Assa, A., 2007. Pratiques culturales et teneur en éléments anti nutritionnels (nitrates et pesticides) du solanum macrocarpum au sud du Bénin. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 7, 1–21.

Barraza, D., Jansen, K., van Wendel de Joode, B., Wesseling, C., 2013. Social Movements and Risk Perception: Unions, Churches, Pesticides and Bananas in Costa Rica. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 19(1): 11-21.

Bates R., 1981, Market and States in Tropical Africa. The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies, Berkeley, University of California Press.

Bayart J.-F. et Warnier J-P., 2004. Matière à politique. Le pouvoir, les corps et les choses, Paris, Karthala.

Bayart J.-F., 2004. Le gouvernement du monde. Une critique politique de la globalisation, Paris, Fayar.

Bayart J.-F., Ellis S.et Hibou B., 1997. La criminalisation de l’Etat en Afrique, Bruxelles, Complexe, 1997

Bayart J.-F., Mbembe A.et Toulabor C., 2008. Le politique par le bas en Afrique noire, Paris Karthala.

Berthélemy J-C., 2016, Les mini-réseaux électriques comme exemple d’application des thèses d’Elinor Ostrom sur la gouvernance polycentrique de la tragédie des communs, Revue d’Economie du Développement, vol 24, p.85-106.

Bohme, S.R., 2014. Toxic Injustice: A Transnational History of Exposure and Struggle, Oakland: University of California Press.

Bonnefoy N., 2012. Rapport d’information fait au nom de la mission commune d’information sur les pesticides, n° 42, Tome 1 et 2.

Calvet R. et al, 2005, Les pesticides dans le sol : Conséquences agronomiques et environnementales, Paris, France Agricole.

Chandre F. et al., 1999. “Status of pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato”, Bulletin World Health Organization, n° 77, p. 230-234.

Cissé, I., Tandia, A.A., Fall, S.T., Diop, E.H.S., 2003. Usage incontrôlé des pesticides en agriculture périurbaine : cas de la zone des Niayes au Sénégal. Cahiers Agricultures 12, 181–186.

Corbel V. et al, 2007, « Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus from Benin, West Africa, Acta Trop, n° 101, pp. 207-216.

Daleb, A. A., 2014. Construction sociale des processus décisionnels en matière d’usage des pesticides par les maraichers de Sèmè-Kpodji (Mémoire de DEA, Filière : sociologie-anthropologie. Option : sociologie du développement). Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.

Daleb, A.A., Gbofan F.N., Mongbo R., Egrot M., 2018. « Filets imprégnés d’insecticides utilisés dans l’activité de maraîchage au Bénin : une innovation de santé par dérivation et par procuration », In C Haxaire, B Moutaud et C Farnarier (dir.), L’innovation en santé. Technologies, organisations, changements, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Collection le Sens social, Rennes : 115-131.

Déguénon E., 2000. Problématique foncière et développement de l’agriculture urbaine à Cotonou et environs : l’expérience de l’Union Communale des Producteurs de Cotonou en matière de recherche de solutions, leçons à tirer et propositions d’actions pour développer une agriculture urbaine et périurbaine durable, Rapport du séminaire du groupe thématique “Agriculture et Développement Urbain”, Cotonou.

Delville P. L., 2017, « Regards sur l'action publique en Afrique », Anthropologie et développement, n° 45, pp. 13-22.

Delville P. L., 2018, « Les réformes de politiques publiques en Afrique de l’Ouest, entre polity, politics et extraversion. Eau potable et foncier en milieu rural (Bénin, Burkina Faso) », Gouvernement et action publique, n° 2 pp. 53-73.

Doudou D.T. and Adou S.A., 2018. Social constructs of pesticide effectiveness among social actors in Bouaké. January 2018, The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention 5(1), DOI: 10.18535/ijsshi/v5i1.06

Dozon J-P., 2001. Quatre modèles de prévention. In : DozonJean-Pierre (ed.), Fassin D. (ed.) Critique de la santé publique : une approche anthropologique. Paris : Balland, 23-46. (Voix et Regards). ISBN 2-7158-1376-7

Duran, P., 2010.Penser l'action publique, Paris, LGDJ.

Eboko, F., 2015. Repenser l’action publique en Afrique : Du Sida à l’analyse de la globalisation des politiques publiques, Karthala.

Escobar A., 1995, Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World.  Princeton: Princeton University Press.

FMI, 2016. ‘’Croissance entre 1970 et 2015 » in Côte d’Ivoire : questions générales.

Fonds des Nations Unies pour l’Alimentation (FAO), 2012, Code international de conduite pour la distribution et l'utilisation des pesticides. Directives pour la prévention et la gestion de la résistance aux pesticides.

Gabas J-J, 2003, Acteurs et politiques publiques, Monde en développement, n° 124, pp. 33-47.

Gambotti C., 2015, L’évaluation des politiques publiques en Côte d’Ivoire, Géoéconomie, n° 77, pp. 125-138.

Garrigou A., et al., 2020. Critical review of the role of PPE in the prevention of risks related to agricultural pesticide use, Safety Science, Volume 123, 2020, 104527, ISSN 0925-7535, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104527

Gbofan, F., 2014. Genre et usages des pesticides dans la production maraichère sur le site de Houéyiho à Cotonou (Mémoire de DEA, Filière : sociologie-anthropologie. Option : sociologie du développement). Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.

Gourgues G. et Hamzaoui O., 2009, « Les politiques publiques comme objet ou problème. Genèse et trajectoire d’une problématisation dans l’analyse des politiques publiques en France ». Congrès de l’Association Française de Science Politique, Grenoble, France.

Hagstrum D.W et Subramanyam B., 2000. Alternatives To Pesticides in Stored-Product IPM. Springer Sciences + Business Media, LLC.

Hassenteufel, P., 2009, Sociologie politique : l'action publique, Coll. U, Paris, Armand Colin.

Hossain L., Rahman R., and Khan S.M., 2017. Alternatives of Pesticides, Springer International Publishing M.S. Khan, M.S. Rahman (eds.), Pesticide Residue in Foods, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-52683-6_9

INSERM, 2013. Pesticides. Effets sur la santé, Paris, Inserm.

Jacob S ; et Rothmayr C., 2012, « L’analyse des politiques publiques », Christian Dagenais et Valéry Ridde (dir.), Approches et pratiques en évaluation de programmes, pp. 71-88, Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal.

Jansen K., 2017, « Business conflict and risk regulation: understanding the influence of the pesticide industry ». Global Environmental Politics, n°4 (17), pp. 48‑66.

Jansen, K., 2003, « Crisis discourses and technology regulation in a weak state:responses to a pesticide disaster in Honduras ». Development and Change, n°34 (1),pp. 45‑66.

Kanda, M., Djaneye-Boundjou, G., Wala, K., Gnandi, K., Batawila, K., Sanni, A., Akpagana, K., 2013. Application des pesticides en agriculture maraichère au Togo. VertigO. doi:10.4000/vertigo.13456

Lanciano, E., Bon, N., Hérault-Fournier, C., Aubrée, P., 2010. Diversité des logiques de travail dans les exploitations maraîchères en circuits courts. Presented at the 4ièmes journées de recherche en Sciences sociales - INRA SFER CIRAD.

Lapeyre F., et Lemaître A., 2014. Politiques publiques et pratiques de l’économie informelle en Afrique subsaharienne. Collection « Espace Afrique » 14. Louvain-La-Neuve: Academia L’Harmattan, 2014.

Le Meur, Y., 2011. Anthropologie politique de la gouvernance : acteurs, ressources, dispositifs, Sarrebrück, Editions Universitaires Européennes.

Licciardi S., Assogba-Komlan F., Sidick I., Chandre F., Hougard J-M et Thibaud M., 2008. “A temporary tunnel screen as an eco-friendly method for small-scale growers to protect cabbage crop in Benin”, International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, n° 27, 3-4, p. 152-158.

Mamadou, A., Doumma, A., Mazih, A., Coulibaly, B.M., 2008. Exposition aux organophosphorés en milieu rural nigérien. [VertigO]La revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement 8, 0–0.

Mfoukou-Ntsakala, A., Bitémo, M., Speybroeck, N., Van Huylenbroeck, G., Thys, É., 2006. Agriculture urbaine et subsistance des ménages dans une zone de post-conflit en Afrique centrale. Biotechnologie agronomie société et environnement, 10, 237–249.

Muller P., 2009, Les politiques publiques, Paris, PUF.

Nguyen-Vaucheret, Shanahan, S., M., Williams, J., et Trent, S. 2002. « Death in small doses: Cambodia’s pesticide problems and solutions, Report by the Environmental Justice Foundation ». London, UK: Environmental Justice Foundation.

Nicourt, C., Girault, J.M., 2009. Le coût humain des pesticides. [VertigO]La revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement 9, 0–0.

Nikol, L., Jansen, K., 2020. The Politics of Counter-Expertise on Aerial Spraying: Social Movements Denouncing Pesticide Risks in the Philippines. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(1): 99-124.

Olivier de Sardan, J.P., 1995. Anthropologie et développement. Essai en anthropologie du changement social, Paris, APAD/Karthala

Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (OMS), 2011, Principes directeurs pour la gestion des pesticides utilisés en santé publique dans la région africaine de l’OMS.

Organisation Mondiale de la Santé et Programme des Nations Unies pour l’Environnement, 1991, L'utilisation des pesticides en agriculture et ses conséquences pour la santé publique. Genève, OMS.

Ouattara Z. A., Doudou D. T., 2020. Usages sociaux des contenants de pesticides chez les cotonculteurs du nord de la Côte d’Ivoire. Environnement, Risques & Santé. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1684/ers.2020.1473

Paquin S., Bernier L. et Lachapelle G. (dir.), 2011, L’analyse des politiques publiques, Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal.

Passos C. J. S., 2016, « Exposition humaine aux pesticides : un facteur de risque pour le suicide au Brésil? », VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement [En ligne], Volume 7 Numéro 1 | avril 2006, mis en ligne le 07 avril 2006, consulté le 10 juillet 2019. URL : https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/2098

Ridde V. et Olivier de Sardan, J.P., 2012. Etudier les politiques publiques et les politiques de santé en Afrique, De Boeck Supérieur | « Afrique contemporaine » 3 n° 243 | pages 98 à 99 ISSN 0002-0478 ISBN 9782804175757, https://www.cairn.info/revue-afrique-contemporaine-2012-3-page-98.htm

RoufaïD., 2002. Contribution à l’étude d’impacts de l’utilisation des engrais chimiques et des pesticides sur la qualité des eaux de surface dans la réserve de biosphère de la Pendjari, Mémoire d’Ingénieur des Travaux en Techniques d’Aménagement et Protection de l’Environnement, Université d’Abomey-Calavi.

Sæthre M-G., Assogba-Komlan F., Svendsen N. O., Holen B. et Godonou I., 2011. “Pesticide residues analysis of three vegetable crops for urban consumers in Benin”, Norway, n° 6, 40, 24 p.

Salles, D., Barrault, J., 2010. Sociologie des usages des pesticides dans les jardins amateurs (PHYTOVILLE). Rapport final, programme Pesticides (APR 2006).

Sawadogo, A., 1974. La stratégie du développement de l’agriculture en Côte-d’Ivoire. Bulletin de l’Association de géographes français 87–103.

Soclo, H.H., Azontonde, A.H., Dovonon, L.F., Djibril, R., Sagbo, A.U., 2004. Etude de l’impact de l’utilisation des engrais chimiques et des pesticides par les populations riveraines sur les écosystèmes (eaux de surface, végétaux et faune) des Aires Protégées (Parcs Nationaux et Zones Cynégétiques) du Bénin (Rapport Final). Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Elevage et de la Pêche de la République du Bénin, Centre National de Gestion des Réserves de Faune (CENAGREF), Programme de Conservation et de Gestion des Parcs Nationaux (PCGPN), Cotonou.

Sposito D.T, 2010. Agriculture urbaine et périurbaine pour la sécurité alimentaire en Afrique de l’Ouest. Le cas des micro-jardins dans la municipalité de Dakar. Université Degli Studi de Milan, Département d’Ingénieurie Agricole.

Stéphane P., Hélène M., Elise C., 2016. L’évaluation des politiques publiques : comprendre et pratiquer. Presses de l’EHESP.

Thiam A. et Sagna M. B., 2009, Monitoring des pesticides au niveau des communautés à la base, Dakar, Pesticide Action Network Africa.

Thibaud M., Assogba-Komlan., Sidick I., Ahle V. et Chandre F., 2010. “An Acaricide-treated Net to Control Phytophagous Mites”, Crop Protection, n° 29, 5, p.  470-75.

ThibaudM., Ochou G., Hala N. F., Vassal J-M., et Vaissayre M., 2000. “Pyrethroid resistance in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner), in West Africa”, Pest Management Science, n° 56, p. 549-554.

Tohozin A. Y., Glele K. A. et Mongbo R., 2012. « Pression foncière et disponibilité en vivriers des ménages agricoles dans la commune d’Abomey-Calavi », Revue de Géographie du LARDYMES, n° 8, p. 174-189.

Tourneux H., 1993. « La perception des pictogrammes phytosanitaires par les paysans du Nord-Cameroun », Coton Fibres Trop, 48 : 41-56.

Traoré S.K. et al, 2006. « Contamination de l'eau souterraine par les pesticides en régions agricoles en Côte-d'Ivoire (centre, Sud et Sud-Ouest) », Journal Africain des Sciences de l'Environnement, 1 : 1-9.

VidalL., 1996. Le silence et le sens. Essai d'anthropologie du sida en Afrique, Paris, Anthropos, 1996, 217 p.

Vidal, L.,1999. “La Transmission. Le Sida Et Ses Savoirs.” L'Homme, no. 150, 1999, pp. 59–83. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/40661366. Accessed 5 Oct. 2020.

Vlassopoulou C. A., 2000, « Politiques publiques comparées pour une approche définitionnelle et diachronique », CURAPP, Les méthodes au concret, Paris, PUF, pp. 187.

Vollet D. et Hadjab F., 2008, Manuel de l'évaluation des politiques publiques, Versailles, Editions Quae.

Yao K.R., 2017. Logiques sociales des usages maraîchers et domestiques des pesticides dans la ville de Bouaké, Mémoire de Master, Université Alassane Ouattara, Département d’Anthropologie et de sociologie.

Zittoun P., 2013. La fabrique politique des politiques publiques, Coll. Sc Po Gouvernances, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po.



  • Université Alassane Ouattara
    Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire (01)


  • Wednesday, March 31, 2021


  • politique publique, pesticide, Afrique, pays du Sud, mise en œuvre, controverse, mobilisation sociale, sécurité au travail, alternative écologique, vie sociale, transfert de politique, usage de politique


  • Dimi Théodore Doudou
    courriel : theodoredoudou [at] uao [dot] edu [dot] ci
  • Konan Jérôme Kouakou
    courriel : jeromekouakou [at] uao [dot] edu [dot] ci
  • Judith Djoman epse Méité
    courriel : crd [dot] dir [at] gmail [dot] com

Information source

  • Dimi Théodore Doudou
    courriel : theodoredoudou [at] uao [dot] edu [dot] ci


CC0-1.0 This announcement is licensed under the terms of Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal.

To cite this announcement

« Implementation of public policies on pesticides in the global South », Call for papers, Calenda, Published on Friday, February 19, 2021, https://doi.org/10.58079/162d

Archive this announcement

  • Google Agenda
  • iCal
Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search